- Comments (73)
- Text Size: Down Up
moneysense.ca, 5/04/06
Classic Couch Potato Portfolio: Historical performance tables
Investment performance figures for the Classic Couch Potato Portfolio by annual nominal value, annualized rate of return and annual return.
Contents
If you invested $100 in the Classic Couch Potato portfolio on January 1, 1976, it would be worth $3,481.35 as of December 31, 2010.
If you invested $100 in the Canadian Stock Index (now called the S&P/TSX Composite Index) on January 1, 1976, it would be worth $3,184.62 as of December 31, 2010.
Track record*
| Year | Couch Potato portfolio | Canadian stock index |
| 1976 | 118.35 | 100.14 |
| 1977 | 125.46 | 120.97 |
| 1978 | 145.01 | 155.70 |
| 1979 | 172.11 | 223.66 |
| 1980 | 209.45 | 288.78 |
| 1981 | 195.46 | 257.11 |
| 1982 | 243.14 | 265.61 |
| 1983 | 298.42 | 361.89 |
| 1984 | 323.22 | 350.41 |
| 1985 | 418.32 | 434.81 |
| 1986 | 475.21 | 469.99 |
| 1987 | 482.22 | 493.65 |
| 1988 | 525.46 | 544.02 |
| 1989 | 633.54 | 655.11 |
| 1990 | 600.74 | 533.66 |
| 1991 | 730.00 | 615.28 |
| 1992 | 793.42 | 601.62 |
| 1993 | 967.15 | 791.22 |
| 1994 | 956.48 | 783.53 |
| 1995 | 1,184.30 | 890.30 |
| 1996 | 1,430.34 | 1,133.73 |
| 1997 | 1,764.35 | 1,293.26 |
| 1998 | 2,048.74 | 1,262.58 |
| 1999 | 2,307.13 | 1,650.03 |
| 2000 | 2,395.07 | 1,758.21 |
| 2001 | 2,267.72 | 1,524.75 |
| 2002 | 2,064.97 | 1,324.34 |
| 2003 | 2,318.29 | 1,665.14 |
| 2004 | 2,516.59 | 1,891.22 |
| 2005 | 2,329.12 | 2,725.07 |
| 2006 | 3,163.45 | 2,725.07 |
| 2007 | 3,331.84 | 2,992.75 |
| 2008 | 2,560.19 | 2,004.84 |
| 2009 | 3,094.81 | 2,707.55 |
| 2010 | 3,481.35 | 3,184.62 |
*Value at end of period, starting with $100 investment on January 1, 1976
Rates of return (%)
| Couch Potato portfolio | Canadian stock index (annualized since 1976) |
| 10.7 | 10.4 |
Year-by-year performance (%)
| Year | Couch Potato portfolio | Canadian stock index |
| 1976 | 18.3 | 10.1 |
| 1977 | 6.0 | 9.8 |
| 1978 | 15.6 | 28.7 |
| 1979 | 18.7 | 43.6 |
| 1980 | 21.7 | 29.1 |
| 1981 | -6.7 | -11.0 |
| 1982 | 24.4 | 3.3 |
| 1983 | 22.7 | 36.2 |
| 1984 | 8.3 | -3.2 |
| 1985 | 29.4 | 24.1 |
| 1986 | 13.6 | 8.1 |
| 1987 | 1.5 | 5.0 |
| 1988 | 9.0 | 10.2 |
| 1989 | 20.6 | 20.4 |
| 1990 | -5.2 | -15.5 |
| 1991 | 21.5 | 11.1 |
| 1992 | 8.7 | -2.2 |
| 1993 | 21.9 | 31.5 |
| 1994 | -1.1 | -1.0 |
| 1995 | 23.8 | 13.6 |
| 1996 | 20.8 | 27.3 |
| 1997 | 23.4 | 14.1 |
| 1998 | 16.1 | -2.4 |
| 1999 | 12.6 | 30.7 |
| 2000 | 3.8 | 6.6 |
| 2001 | -5.3 | -13.3 |
| 2002 | -8.9 | -13.1 |
| 2003 | 12.3 | 25.7 |
| 2004 | 8.6 | 13.6 |
| 2005 | 12.6 | 23.2 |
| 2006 | 11.7 | 17.0 |
| 2007 | 5.3 | 9.8 |
| 2008 | -23.2 | -33.0 |
| 2009 | 20.88 | 35.05 |
| 2010 | 12.49 | 17.62 |
2009 Month-by-month performance (%)
| 2009 | Couch Potato portfolio | Canadian stock index |
| January | -4.18 | -2.96 |
| February | -5.32 | -6.31 |
| March | 5.83 | 7.79 |
| April | 5.51 | 7.26 |
| May | 5.30 | 11.46 |
| June | 0.50 | 0.34 |
| July | 4.11 | 4.22 |
| August | 3.15 | 0.95 |
| September | 3.16 | 5.14 |
| October | -1.80 | -0.79 |
| November | 4.32 | 5.15 |
| December | 0.79 | 2.93 |
2010 Month-by-month performance (%)
| 2010 | Couch Potato portfolio | Canadian stock index |
| January | -2.33 | -5.35 |
| February | 2.71 | 4.97 |
| March | 2.89 | 3.81 |
| April | 0.93 | 1.67 |
| May | -3.69 | -3.47 |
| June | -2.15 | -3.71 |
| July | 3.63 | 3.96 |
| August | -0.1 | 1.9 |
| September | 3.7 | 4.1 |
| October | 2.27 | 2.71 |
| November | 0.39 | 2.37 |
| December | 3.76 | 4.09 |
2011 Month-by-month performance (%)
| 2011 | Couch Potato portfolio | Canadian stock index |
| January | 0.83 | 0.99 |
| February | 2.59 | 4.44 |
| March | 0.06 | 0.12 |
| April | 0.78 | -1.02 |
| May | -0.07 | -0.87 |
| June | -1.72 | -3.33 |
Updated on November 7, 2011
For more current couch potato returns, visit our Canadian Couch Potato blog.
See our Global Couch Potato Portfolio: Historical performance tables.
moneysense.ca, 5/04/06










Why would you lose $187.47 in 2005 if the market went up 12.6%
Read was interesting, stay in touch……
[...]please visit the sites we follow, including this one, as it represents our picks from the web[...]……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
[...]below you will find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]…
Related……
[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]……
Great website…
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
Links…
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……
The layout is what really caught my eye, then the i looked at the writing and i think you did a very nice job.
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
Awesome website…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]…
Awesome website…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……