- Comments (117)
- Text Size: Down Up
moneysense.ca, 17/06/10
The 2010 Charity 100: Methodology
Here’s how we came up with our point totals.
The financial data comes from the charities’ 2008 Canada Revenue Agency T3010 information returns.
The charities on our list are the biggest charities in Canada terms of both tax-receipted donations and non-tax receipted money received through fundraising. We excluded some organizations not generally thought of as charities, such as churches and universities.
Charities were divided up into nine categories. Culture Arts & Research, Environment, Fundraising Organizations, Health/Health Services, Hospital Foundations, Health/Medical Services, International Aid & Development, Other, Religion and Social Services. Fundraising organizations were defined as organizations with more than 60% of their expenses going to outside charities.
OVERALL CHARITY EFFICIENCY (MAX 10 POINTS)
1) The amounts spent on charitable programs and donated to other charities were added up and divided by the total expenses.
2) Then points were awarded based on these ranges:
Regular charities
10 points for 85%-100%, 7.5 points for 75%-85%, 5 points for 65%-75%, 2.5 points for 60%-65%, 0 points for less than 60%.
Fundraising organizations and hospital foundations
10 points for 90%-100%, 7.5 points for 80%-90%, 5 points for 75-80%, 2.5 points for 70%-75%, 0 points for less than 70%.
3) Scores were totaled and a normalized across each type of charity. This ensured we compared each charity to other similarly structured charities in the same category.
FUNDRAISING EFFICIENCY (MAX 10 POINTS)
1) Fundraising costs were divided by the total of money raised through tax-receipted donations and money raised through fundraising.
2) Then points were awarded based on these ranges:
Regular charities
10 points for $0 to $10; 7.5 points for $10-$20, 5 points for $20-$30, 2.5 points for $30-$35, zero points for more than $35.
Fundraising organizations and hospital foundations
10 points for $0-$5, 7.5 points for $5-$10, 5 points for $10-$20, 2.5 points for $20-$30, 0 points for more than $30.
3) Scores were totaled and a normalized across each type of charity. This ensured we compared each charity to other similarly structured charities in the same category.
GOVERNANCE (MAX 10 POINTS + 1 BONUS POINT)
1) Half of the points in this category are awarded based on a short governance questionnaire that we sent out to all 100 charities. A charity got half of one point for each of the following questions they answered yes to. If the organization didn’t respond to the questionnaire after a follow up phone call, they received zero out of five points. Here are the questions:
Does the board of directors of your organization approve the budget?
Does the board of directors of your organization approve the CRA filings?
Does the board of directors of your organization approve the audited financial statements?
Does the board of directors of your organization approve the fundraising policies?
Does the board of directors of your organization approve the governance policies?
Does the CEO have a formal CEO performance review at least once every two years?
Does the organization have a formal strategic plan?
Does it have a process in place for measuring program effectiveness?
Does the organization have a conflict of interest policy covering board members and staff?
Has it adopted an ethical code, such as the one created by Imagine Canada?
2) The other five points in this category were given for transparency.
Charities that had completed audited financial statements on their website were given four points. If they posted only partial financial statements online, or if they provided us with complete audited financial statements only upon request, we gave them two points. If they refused to provide financial statements, or didn’t respond at all, they got zero points.
If the organization had a privacy policy on its website explaining how personal information was used, it got another point.
Charities that disclosed their CEOs’ exact salary on our questionnaire were awarded one bonus point in this category.
3) Scores were totaled and a normalized across each type of charity. This ensured we compared each charity to other similarly structured charities in the same category.
RESERVES (MAX 5 POINTS)
1) Liabilities and capital assets were subtracted from assets, and that total was divided by overall expenses. Some charities, such as hospitals and art galleries, were not measured in terms of reserves, as reserves are generally not held in those sectors.
2) Points were awarded for the amount of reserves as follows: 0 points for less than one month in reserve, 2.5 points for 1-3 months, 5 points for 3 months to 3 years, 2.5 points for 3 years to 5 years, 0 points for more than 5 years.
3) Scores were totaled and a normalized across each type of charity. This ensured we compared each charity to other similarly structured charities in the same category.
FINAL SCORE
The overall score for each charity was as follows:
Maximum of 10 points for charity efficiency
Maximum of 10 points for fundraising efficiency
Maximum of 10 points for governance and 1 bonus point for salary disclosure
Maximum of 5 points for reserves for all charities (other than hospitals and museums)
Each charity’s total out of a maximum of 35 + the bonus point (30 + bonus point for hospitals and museums) was converted to a percentage out of 100. These percentages were then normalized by category of charity to the total charity population.
moneysense.ca, 17/06/10











Cool Posting…
..This posting was wickid cool…
The best website……
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
There are some fascinating time limits on this article however I don’t know if I see all of them center to heart. There’s some validity but I will take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we want extra! Added to FeedBurner as properly
From all the blogs I’ve be familiar with lately, this undivided seems to be the most affecting – it gave me something to think about.
Hey, thanks for the awesome posting. I’m having troubles with subscribing to your blogs feed. Thought I’d let you know
thanks !! very helpful post!
I apperceive i am a small away topic, but i just funds to say i adulation the blueprint of the blog. i am new in the direction of blogegine platform, so any tips on accepting my web page analytic good can be appreciated.
Hello, you have a great blog. Get Warm and Comfortable And Buy Yourself Or Friend Some New Slippers Today!
I want to get across my passion for your kindness in support of those people that absolutely need assistance with the situation. Your real commitment to passing the solution across has been amazingly important and has constantly made professionals like me to attain their desired goals. This interesting tips and hints denotes a whole lot a person like me and additionally to my colleagues. Best wishes; from all of us.
Great information, I value all of these opinions. Everyone needs to finish feeling emancipated to extract themselves frankly
Thank you for all your work on this site. Gloria loves going through internet research and it is obvious why. Almost all notice all relating to the dynamic method you offer precious tactics on your web blog and therefore recommend response from visitors on that area of interest while my daughter is in fact discovering a great deal. Take pleasure in the remaining portion of the year. You’re doing a powerful job.
I’m extremely to death to I ground this post. Thanks you with a view sharing us rigorous info.
I exceptionally loved reading your post. Thanks!A field near to my nub cheers, do you acquire a RSS food ?
Hi there could I innuendo some of the acuteness from this entry if I afford a relationship retire from to your site?
With all the girl friend floating about on the net, it is a top mutation of measure to read a locale like yours instead.