- Comments (30)
- Text Size: Down Up
MoneySense Magazine, Summer 2011
What you (really) made on your home
You may not want to know.
We Recommend
In recent years, homeowners have been feeling pretty smug about their investing prowess as they’ve watched home prices surge. But the costs homeowners face to buy, sell and maintain their homes mean they haven’t made nearly as much as they think.
In this example, we calculated your real profit — after expenses — if you bought a typical home in the Greater Toronto Area 10 years ago, and sold it this year. We assume that it was purchased with a 10% down payment and a 5% fixed-rate mortgage. The home would have cost $248,601 to buy in 2001 and today it would sell for a hefty $456,147.
So does that mean you made $200,000? Not even close.
2011 sale price: $456,147
Subtract:
• $168,434 for the amount still owing on the mortgage;
• $4,000 for legal fees to buy and sell;
• $22,807 in realtor fees for the sale;
• $159,265 for 10 years of mortgage payments ($1,327 per month for 10 years);
• $42,000 for 10 years of property taxes;
• $19,000 for 10 years of home maintenance;
• $2,211 for the land transfer tax when the home was bought;
• $24,860 for the original down payment; and
• $358 in provincial sales tax on the mortgage insurance.
Actual profit: $13,212
Plus, you got a place to live for the last 10 years, of course.
MoneySense Magazine, Summer 2011











Well, it was a nice read but I really do not agree with it. I own my own property and I consider it an investment for my future and for the future of my children. Meanwhile I do not have to pay nearly as much by owning it as I would spending my money on the renting an apartment..
This guy does not know whatb he is talking about. Plus the original down payment is not lost. It is still in the value of the house this person should go back to grade 9 math class.
If you thought that you have been profitable in your home making you cannot be more wrong. You have to follow the calculations to read all about it
$4 grand in legal fees? Find a new lawyer – $4-500 now, less 10 years ago and than x for sharing it….
Not sure how they deduct about $168,434 for the remaining mortgage since technically, the math of Sale Price – Purchase Price, means that you've paid off all the mortgage. This does not even take into account the fact that you've built equity over the past 10 years and as such, the remaining mortgage is less than the Purchase Price.
In addition, I agree that you would still need to pay rent elsewhere so this example doesn't work out that well.
You can make an argument about all the interest paid while you have a mortgage to show the major opportunity cost of buying but the example is flawed.
This article was simplistic – but it provides an interesting viewpoint. The points made above also valid. To lend my view, I have posted an article on What makes a good property investment. You may be surprised by Point #5.:
http://www.asimkhan.ca/blog/p/whats-the-better-in...
$23,000 for the realtor is a crime….
I arrange lots of real estate deals, $4,000.00 in fees is way too high, a basic transaction should be under $2,000.00 for legal fees.
this is missleading at best. Simplified in not considering the interest over the 10 years
Putting down the major value , that is you have the right to do anything with the asset (ie live in it, rent it) and the value of it) the fact that the value of the asset increases when there is rent increases/inflation. that interest rates vary
Paying down mortgage is not relevant to this, it is only a choice in where you want to invest money, either in the mortgage, or in some alternate means
You should consider returns as a % that is annualized. That way you have a meaningful number to compare to other investments. Use this spreadsheet. http://www.retailinvestor.org/RealEstateReturn.xl...
I have to agree with Paul. You can not say you made any kind of profit if you sell your home and move into a new home that has a 2011 price instead of a 2001 price tag.
The only way to make any sort of profit in real estate is to pay down your mortgage as soon as possible. Saving on mortgage interest by paying down your principal early and investing that once your mortgage is paid is what leads to profit; ownership does not.
I bought a brand new home for 265500 in 2003. On May 2011 – It's fully paid plus the house wort 425000. I sure made money!
You only 'make' money on real estate if you move to a place where the market moved in the other direction.
If my house doubles in value, but so has the house that Im moving to, I havent made any money.
Housing inflation doesnt make you money unless you can sell up and not have to buy a new place. It just makes it harder and harder on first time buyers.
Since the question is how much has your investment appreciated or depreciated, if you compare to a renter you have to match total housing costs spent and what was done with the difference. If the savings of rent over mortgage + house maintenance are invested for retirement, then there is a growing nest egg over 10 years that the homeowner does not have. There is a missing piece of the total portfolio that is missing under "ideal" circumstances.
I am not suggesting though that we debate the merits of how you house yourself or what people should be doing for retirement. It's just the requirement to match apples to apples.