<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Top 500 American Stocks &#124; 2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/11/16/the-top-500-american-stocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/11/16/the-top-500-american-stocks/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Personal Finance Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luigi</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/11/16/the-top-500-american-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-592101</link>
		<dc:creator>Luigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 02:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/12/15/the-top-500-american-stocks/#comment-592101</guid>
		<description>Hello, I am also a digital and paper subscriber to MoneySense. I agree with other subscriber&#039;s comments: When the magazine instructed me to go to moneysense.ca/top200 to find the list, I was not expecting to get redirected to a website asking me to pay additional money. I used to review the Excel file when it was a free download from MoneySense a couple of years ago. 
 
I wonderiif MoneySense and Rogers should not be fairer to their consumer base: This list can be obtained free of charge on other websites, such as Fortune 500.  Indiscriminate gauging is not a fair business practice, IMHO.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I am also a digital and paper subscriber to MoneySense. I agree with other subscriber&#039;s comments: When the magazine instructed me to go to moneysense.ca/top200 to find the list, I was not expecting to get redirected to a website asking me to pay additional money. I used to review the Excel file when it was a free download from MoneySense a couple of years ago. </p>
<p>I wonderiif MoneySense and Rogers should not be fairer to their consumer base: This list can be obtained free of charge on other websites, such as Fortune 500.  Indiscriminate gauging is not a fair business practice, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gues</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/11/16/the-top-500-american-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-579212</link>
		<dc:creator>Gues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/12/15/the-top-500-american-stocks/#comment-579212</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with the previous posters. When reading the magazine, I thought I could access the US list here. This is a cheat. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with the previous posters. When reading the magazine, I thought I could access the US list here. This is a cheat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stethpg</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/11/16/the-top-500-american-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-573686</link>
		<dc:creator>stethpg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/12/15/the-top-500-american-stocks/#comment-573686</guid>
		<description>I to object to being charged for the Top 500 U.S. stocks, no mention of any charges until you actually try and access the information, a bit of trickery in my opinion, not impressed </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I to object to being charged for the Top 500 U.S. stocks, no mention of any charges until you actually try and access the information, a bit of trickery in my opinion, not impressed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StefaniaMoretti</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/11/16/the-top-500-american-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-573256</link>
		<dc:creator>StefaniaMoretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/12/15/the-top-500-american-stocks/#comment-573256</guid>
		<description>Hi Barbara,  
Thanks for your comments. We&#039;re always taking reader feedback into consideration when planning future issues. Happy holidays.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barbara,<br />
Thanks for your comments. We&#039;re always taking reader feedback into consideration when planning future issues. Happy holidays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/11/16/the-top-500-american-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-573152</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/12/15/the-top-500-american-stocks/#comment-573152</guid>
		<description>I already pay for the magazine subscription. I do not appreciate being asked to pay for digital information that should be included in the print version. I have no problem with you charging non-subscribers for the information, but those who have already paid for the magazine should not be asked to pay again. Please let me know if this will be an ongoing practice. If so, I will not  be renewing my subscription when it expires; I might as well just purchase complete information online. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already pay for the magazine subscription. I do not appreciate being asked to pay for digital information that should be included in the print version. I have no problem with you charging non-subscribers for the information, but those who have already paid for the magazine should not be asked to pay again. Please let me know if this will be an ongoing practice. If so, I will not  be renewing my subscription when it expires; I might as well just purchase complete information online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StefaniaMoretti</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/11/16/the-top-500-american-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-573129</link>
		<dc:creator>StefaniaMoretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/12/15/the-top-500-american-stocks/#comment-573129</guid>
		<description>Hi Bruce,  
moneysense.ca/top200 takes you to a page where current subscribers like yourself can purchase the Top 200 Premium Package digital download (containing excel tables with the Top 200 Canadian Stocks, Top 500 American stocks + bonus stock picks) for $14.95.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bruce,<br />
moneysense.ca/top200 takes you to a page where current subscribers like yourself can purchase the Top 200 Premium Package digital download (containing excel tables with the Top 200 Canadian Stocks, Top 500 American stocks + bonus stock picks) for $14.95.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/11/16/the-top-500-american-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-573124</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/12/15/the-top-500-american-stocks/#comment-573124</guid>
		<description>When I go to that site I get the Rogers site that only allows one to purchase another subscription. I cannot find where it is available to current subscribers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I go to that site I get the Rogers site that only allows one to purchase another subscription. I cannot find where it is available to current subscribers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StefaniaMoretti</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/11/16/the-top-500-american-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-573104</link>
		<dc:creator>StefaniaMoretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/12/15/the-top-500-american-stocks/#comment-573104</guid>
		<description>Hi Ken,  
We appreciate your feedback. The magazine featured the U.S. All-Stars from our Top 500 American Stocks. The full list is available here: moneysense.ca/top200  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ken,<br />
We appreciate your feedback. The magazine featured the U.S. All-Stars from our Top 500 American Stocks. The full list is available here: moneysense.ca/top200</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
