Trailing commissions harm investors

It’s time for regulators to put investors first

  4 Premium content image

by

Online only.

  4 Premium content image
(Illustration by Sebastien Thibault)

(Illustration by Sebastien Thibault)

A study commissioned by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) now provides empirical proof that trailing commissions impact mutual fund sales to the detriment of investors.

“Unambiguous,” is how the report’s author Prof. Douglas Cumming, Ontario Research Chair at the Schulich School of Business, describes the findings. All that remains is for the CSA to finally ban trailing commissions, as other Western countries already have.

“There’s an urgent need to resolve this issue,” says Neil Gross, executive director of Fair Canada. “Now that [the CSA] has this data, they need to translate it into action.”

Trailing commissions hard investors Cumming’s research is based on detailed fund data obtained directly from manufacturers of publicly offered mutual funds in Canada. Key findings show that an increase in trailers corresponds with a decrease in fund performance, while a decrease in trailers corresponds with an increase in performance. As for the influence of past performance, Cumming found it’s considerably reduced when fund manufacturers pay sales and trailing commissions. What the data indicate clearly, he says, is that funds with embedded trailers, on average, perform poorly. The Ontario Securities Commission, which falls under the CSA’s umbrella, declined to be interviewed for this article. But in public statements, OSC vice chair Monica Kowal said three policy directions are being considered to improve outcomes for investors: 1) a ban or cap on trailing commissions; 2) a best interest standard that requires advisors to put their client’s interest first when choosing investments; and 3) improved fee transparency and control over fund costs.

Cumming and Gross agree that capping trailers or enhancing fee disclosure aren’t the right moves, mainly because neither would address the systemic and structural conflicts of interest between investors and advisors that negatively impact investment performance. Moreover, says Gross, trailers need to be banned: They’re harmful to the market as a whole because they assist in the deterioration of fund performance. “That should be of major concern to regulators.”

4 comments on “Trailing commissions harm investors

  1. Looks like Money Sense is is running out of topics. This has been hashed over a hundred time previous.

    Reply

  2. Try a new subject !!!!! This one has been hashed over and over again already !!!

    Reply

  3. My comment will not be moderated. !!!!! I live in Canada not Russia

    Reply

  4. Thanks for the reminder David. What about becoming a member of a service that attributes commissions back to the investor’s account? I recall an analysis of this making sense after a certain portfolio size (base on membership fees), and recall this being available for both mutual funds and insurance policies.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *