Trudeau’s plan: Rich to pay for middle-class tax cuts

1.5% tax cut for anyone with income between $44,701 & $89,401

  6

by

Online only.

  6
TORONTO, ON- MARCH 9  -  Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau speaks at the Royal York Hotel about "Liberty in a culturally diverse society." while addressing the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada  in the Canadian Room at the Royal York Hotel in Toronto.  March 9, 2015.        (Steve Russell/Toronto Star via Getty Images)

(Steve Russell/Toronto Star via Getty Images)

OTTAWA – Justin Trudeau has unveiled the Liberal alternative to the Harper government’s economic plan: hike taxes for the wealthiest one per cent to pay for more generous child benefits and an across-the-board income tax cut for the middle class.

Under the Liberal proposal announced Monday:

— The 22-per-cent tax rate for anyone with a taxable annual income between $44,701 and $89,401 would be cut to 20.5 per cent.

— A new tax bracket of 33 per cent would be imposed on those with taxable incomes over $200,000 a year. The current top bracket of 29 per cent would continue to apply to those earning between $138,586 and $200,000.

A Trudeau government would also scrap Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s newly enriched universal child care benefit and roll together two other existing child benefits into a single, more generous, monthly, tax-free “Canada child benefit.”

“We can do more for the people who need it, by doing less for the people who don’t,” Trudeau said at a campaign-style event at a family restaurant in nearby Aylmer, Que. “

According to the Liberals, all families with kids under 18 and an annual income below $150,000, or 90 per cent of families, would receive more under Trudeau’s plan than they do under Harper’s.

Monday’s announcement puts in place a central pillar of the Liberals’ eventual platform for the fall election. And it is a reply to last month’s Conservative pre-election budget, which pivots around twin measures to allow parents with children under 18 to split their income for tax purposes and to expand and enrich the universal child care benefit.

“Canada has always done well when most Canadians are doing well — when we have a strong and successful middle class,” Trudeau told the crowd. “The fact is, over the past 10 years, Mr. Harper’s plan has failed. We are not getting the economic growth, and we’re not getting fairness and success for the middle class.”

Trudeau has previously promised to scrap the $2 billion parental income-splitting scheme, which numerous economists and think tanks have said will benefit less than 15 per cent of Canadian families, primarily the wealthiest.

He is now promising to do away with the Tory-introduced universal child care benefit as well, contending that it makes no sense to dole out equal benefits to rich and poor families alike.

The Conservative government has just boosted that benefit to $160 from $100 a month for each child under the age of six. And it has expanded the program to give families $60 a month for every child between six and 17.

Trudeau proposes to roll together and enrich two other existing benefits that are geared to income — the Canada child tax benefit and the national child benefit supplement — into a single, enriched benefit that would give families up to $6,400 annually for every child under six and up to $5,400 for children aged six to 17.

The benefit level would be tied to family income and would gradually disappear at higher income levels.

The benefit would be “simple, meaningful, monthly and tax-free. But most of all, it will be fair,” Trudeau said.

Trudeau has promised that the eventual Liberal platform will be fully costed and designed within the framework of a balanced federal budget.

His proposed changes to tax brackets would be revenue neutral — a tax cut of $3 billion a year for the middle class counterbalanced by an additional $3 billion in taxes on the wealthy, the Liberals said.

However, Trudeau’s proposed new child benefit would cost the federal treasury an additional $4 billion a year. That would be paid for, in part, by scrapping the Harper government’s $2-billion parental income-splitting scheme.

Trudeau has also promised to reverse the recently announced plan to almost double the amount people can sock away annually in tax-free savings accounts — another measure Trudeau maintains will primarily benefit the wealthy.

That would give him another $1 billion immediately —and potentially billions more over the longer term — to finance his own program.

6 comments on “Trudeau’s plan: Rich to pay for middle-class tax cuts

  1. Everything I read in the article seems good, but reversing the increase to TFSA accounts.

    Reply

  2. Can you tell it is election time? When they run out of other people’s money, then what will they promise. Oh yeah, “budgets balance themselves”. No thanks, fool me once…

    Reply

  3. This is really not a great plan and it certainly does not help strong successful middle class families. Child tax benefit (CCTB) is based on the family income, if you go to CRA’s CCTB calculator, most family with 1 child and a combined income of more than 120K$ gets pretty much nothing. When you need to pay your mortgage, your car, childcare, etc. you’re certainly not rich with 120K$ and can only be considered solid middle class. The universal child care benefit was designed so that every family with young children will get some kind of relief which actually feels much more fair. Anyway, I don’t agree with a lot of the conservatives positions but the Liberals are really not helping.

    Reply

  4. my husband made 128 total last year and i am trying to run a small salon and don’t make much right now…between putting 3 kids thro college and pay a mortgage, car payments , and necessities we have nothing left and you call us wealthy???

    Reply

  5. Are you saying that someone who makes 89,401.00 $ will be making more than another who is making 90,000$???

    Reply

  6. So a family living off of one income of 151,00 will be paying higher taxes than Justin’s middle class with two income earners living off of $299,00 yup that’s the beauty of it all! Is it really going after the wealthy or just family’s that don’t fit their idea of double income people. Again we will be poorer but in liberals eye rich because we make sacrifices to raise our own children.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *