When investment fees are—and aren’t—worth it
Mauriusz is looking to lower his investment fees after he transferred his investments from a group plan to his bank
Advertisement
Mauriusz is looking to lower his investment fees after he transferred his investments from a group plan to his bank
Q: I am investing with a new bank-owned brokerage, but the fees seem to be higher than I expected. I’ve recently transferred my investments from a group plan through my previous employer. My current MER is around 2%, which may have a big impact on my yearly returns. Any ideas or suggestions to save on fees?—Mauriusz
A: I’m not surprised that you’re suffering from fee shock, Mauriusz. Group plans tends to have pretty low fees—as long as your company’s pension consultant is a good one—and retail investment fees are usually higher by comparison.
Sometimes people are reluctant to transfer money out of their group plans as a result and I don’t blame them. That said, group plans generally have fewer investment choices and they range from bad to good and everything in between, so transferring certainly offers more investment options and control.
In your case, you’re gone now and you’re tasked with evaluating your current options through the bank. Fees of 2% may be high or low, depending on how you are invested and what you are getting.
Is your adviser providing you with financial, tax and estate planning? That has a value, but it may not be worth the incremental fees relative to your old group plan.
If you’re in mutual funds, 2% is actually low compared to the industry average, Mauriusz. An Investor Economics report from 2012 pegged the asset-weighted average MER for load paying equity funds at 2.40%. If you choose index funds and take a passive investment approach—which isn’t for everyone—fees should be less than 1%.
Share this article Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Share on Reddit Share on Email