How and when to switch financial advisers
You can and should track your financial adviser's performance against a benchmark
Advertisement
You can and should track your financial adviser's performance against a benchmark
Q: Overall, we are unhappy with the performance of our financial adviser. My wife and I have been investing in mutual funds, with the same adviser, since we got married 13 years ago. While I understand the markets’ ups and downs, we have been disappointed with the performance of our adviser. We do not get regular updates—ones that encourage calm in the bear storm that is right now, or just regular check-ins when the bulls are out (earlier this year). We are contemplating a switch, so my question is, do we move everything, or start new and wait out the DSC charges that will apply?—Kevin
A: You’re not unlike a lot of Canadians, Kevin—underwhelmed by your adviser. I want to give you some independent advice on your situation so that you can validate your concerns and act accordingly.
I think that all investors should measure their investment performance against benchmarks. Whether you’re a DIY investor or work with an adviser, you should monitor your performance, but do so with a grain of salt. Short-term underperformance is going to happen. Long-term underperformance is a cause for concern. And with fees what they are and interest rates so low, underperformance for mutual funds is becoming that much more common. It’s making it tough for the mutual fund industry these days.
In much the same way individual mutual funds are tracked against a benchmark, you can benchmark your overall investments. If you’re invested 65% in Canadian stocks and 35% in Canadian bonds, for example, you might compare yourself to 65% of the return of the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and 35% of the return of the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Canada Broad Market Index (a bond index), so you have a frame of reference. If you’re in foreign stocks as well or your bonds are not broad-based, but just government bonds, for example, you might need to consider different benchmarks. Appropriate benchmarks are the key.
I suggest benchmarking because I often encounter investors who are wrongly critical of their investment advisers (who are otherwise performing well) or unjustly satisfied with underperformance (because they are looking at absolute instead of relative returns). You can’t assess performance without a benchmark.
I’ll assume you’ve done your due diligence, Kevin. If your adviser is truly under-performing, you might consider a change, but know that the grass is not always greener.
Share this article Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Share on Reddit Share on Email