- Comments (9)
- Text Size: Down Up
SHARING: / - ACTIVITY ▼
MoneySense Magazine, June 2011
The real cost of raising kids
How much are you shelling out for your little bundles of joy? Hang on to your calculator because we’ve crunched the numbers, and the total will shock you
When it comes to the cost of raising my two (now rather large) bundles of joy, I have tended to stick with micro-level calculations: Can we afford to send the kids to camp? How do we pay for those braces? Does she have to have a tutu to go to dance class? (The answer was, of course, a foot-stomping yes.) I tried not to think about the big picture. Too overwhelming.
Nonetheless, for years I’ve heard it said that it costs roughly $160,000 to raise a child from infancy to age 18. Turns out that much-cited figure was originally compiled by Manitoba Agriculture — the actual number for 2004 (the latest year for which the calculation was completed) was $166,972 for a boy and $166,549 for a girl, predicated on the idea that the food cost for boys is higher. But how realistic is that? Does it take into account daycare costs? Orthodontics? RESPs? Extra-curricular activities? Or a bigger house to accommodate the rug rats?
Let’s face it, no set figure can ever really sum up the myriad decisions parents make regarding the care and feeding of their offspring. And really, no one is suggesting that you sit down with a calculator and do a cost/benefit analysis on whether to pull the goalie. But just for interest’s sake (and so you can use it as ammunition with your kids), I teamed up with top demographer Roger Sauvé at People Patterns Consulting in an attempt to break down the costs of everything from nappies to Nutella.
After two months spent knee-deep in reams of Statistics Canada data, we’re proud to announce that we’ve come up with what we believe to be the most comprehensive and accurate estimate of the average cost of raising a Canadian child to age 18 ever published. (To be accurate, it’s the cost of raising a child to the day before his or her 19th birthday, as is the Manitoba Agriculture figure.) Our goal is nothing less than to become Canada’s new official source for the cost of raising kids. After all, someone has to pick up the baton now that Manitoba’s ministry of agriculture has stopped updating its figures.
Before we get started though, let us just point out that the Manitoba number was specific to Winnipeg. It took in food, clothing, health care, personal care, recreation and school supplies, transportation, childcare and finally shelter, furnishings and household operations. We’ve stuck with the same basic categories, but our research is more thorough, and our numbers reflect the average cost per child for middle-class couples with two children across the country, not just for Winnipeg.
Still, it’s important to note that all these costs can be considered merely “rough estimates,” says Sauvé. We looked at the average cost of raising a child in Canada. Very few Canadians will find they are spending exactly the average, just as very few Canadians make exactly the average income. A wealthy two-parent couple will no doubt spend more than our figure, and a money-conscious single parent will likely spend less. Studies also indicate that the more children you have, the less you spend on each one of them (see Cheaper by the dozen) and the amount spent will vary from province to province and by the size of the city you live in. There’s a bit of dumb luck involved too. After all, some kids need braces and tutors, and others don’t. Those caveats aside, read on for the results of MoneySense’s exclusive research into the real cost of raising kids from infancy to 18.
MoneySense Magazine, June 2011


Add the Facebook Social Graph to automatically share stories, video and more with friends. Keep full control of what you publish by adjusting the "On" / "Off" toggle.








It was really helpful that you are sharing this details to your readers, I do personally having a worth while in the article. Thanks for sharing such good release.
I'm not so sure about these numbers…. the difference between a boy and a girl is $423 which is the difference in food cost. 423 divided by 18 (years) = $23.5 a year divided by 12 (months) = $1.95.
From my math this article is saying it cost $1.95 a month more to feed a boy then a girl… Does that really seem logical? Need I say more?
I agree with Vancouver C in that we do not spend more, we spend the same amount differently. My wife and I also tended to centre our activities around our daughter whether we went to her dance competions or took her camping and boating. Great article and one that I will forward to my daughter as she contemplates having children. It will be enlightening to hear her comments.
Would be helpful if you would have all of these numbers in a spreadsheet. I'd like to know how much does it cost per year (not university) to house, feed,etc an 18 year old girl living at home. I pay 700 per month child support and being sued to pay after the kids are 18. Since both parents are expected to pay equally and we both make the same amount, does it cost $1400.00 per month to keep an 18 year old girl living. I would like to dispute this in court if I can find out what the actual cost is.
Although I can see the technical correctness of the previous comments, I really enjoyed this article. It was well thought out and researched. I appreciate a more up-to-date estimation of the cost of children, especially having two rugrats of my own. The inherent limitations of such a task have been adequately addressed. This could have become a dry boring read punctuated with stats. This article was fun to read. I enjoyed the author's sense of humor and down to earth explanation. Great job!
This was my first instinct as well, however after a brief moment's reflection it seems clear, since everything is measured based on what it costs today, that the final tally is in 2011 dollars.
It might have helped to have been more explicit about that, but trying to factor in the time value of money across the 18 years at the time it would be spent is not only a much more onerous calculation, it's also a much less useful one despite being an accurate dollar by dollar representation of cash out the door since the "dollars" are no longer all equal and the distribution and weighting over time isn't transparent. Similarly, displaying a tally in in 2029 dollars has far less relevance to your average reader today.
Great article.
However I think the discussion should be framed less around how much it costs to raise a kid, and more around the lifestyle change, or how much money you're not spending on other stuff. I'd read many an article like this before I had kids, and braced myself for financial struggles ahead, but after a while I noticed that with kids, I don't actually spend more each month… I spend the same, but it's just allocated to different things. Kids are a change in how you spend, not an increase. They're a change in lifestyle.
It would appear that all figures are in current dollars. I.E. if you could prepay the entire costs of 19 years of child raising on the day the child was born, that would be approximately what the bill would come to.
This article completely disregards Time-Value-Money. Are we talking 2011 or 2030 $$$?