Ask MoneySense: Pension deficits

Should you be worried if your company pension is in deficit and only partially funded?



From the December/January 2013 issue of the magazine.


If my company pension is only funded 64% when I retire should I be worried?

— L.V.

Most pensions today are running a deficit due to the low-interest-rate environment. But don’t focus solely on funding levels. You most need to worry about your pension when an insolvent employer is winding up a plan that’s in deficit, says Scott Clausen, professional leader for Canada for retirement, risk and finance at Mercer. “You need a combination of those two things for the plan to be at risk.”

Even if the plan is wound up, the employer would still fund the deficit, Clausen says. More important is the health of your employer: is it teetering on insolvency or in a dying industry? “Pension risks are likely higher at a company that is in a precarious financial situation with a small pension deficit than at a financially strong employer with a large pension deficit,” he says.

Some provinces have safeguards to protect pensioners when plans are wound up with deficits: in Ontario, for instance, the Pension Benefits Guarantee Fund would step in. “But there are limitations and exclusions,” says Clausen. For instance, the PBGF doesn’t cover any plan improvements in the last five years, and benefits above $1,000 a month aren’t covered.

Got a question about your finances? Email us at:

2 comments on “Ask MoneySense: Pension deficits

  1. Nice to see some pension coverage in MoneySense! Public sector pensions have some of the biggest pension deficits, yet any shortfall is covered by taxpayer dollars or higher contributions. Another perk of being in the public sector is that you're almost 100% guaranteed your pension – it's not like the government is going to fail. If you have the choice between the commuted value and a deferred pension, you should really think twice about a deferred pension if you employer is in financial trouble.


  2. With the latest ruling on the position of pensioners in bankruptcy proceedings, isn't there a need for private insurance to protect defined benefit pensions?


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *