Conventional wisdom says young people can afford to be aggressive with their investments, but keep in mind that just because the last 10 years have been great for stocks doesn't mean a painful downturn isn't in the cards.
Photo by Chris Liverani on Unsplash
Q. I’m 30 years old and have 30 years to go until retirement. I already have a good pension with my employer so I’d like to try a 100% equity portfolio. Is there a Couch Potato portfolio that would suit my needs? Any ideas on which ETFs to hold?
A. Conventional investing wisdom says that young people can afford to be very aggressive, especially if they can look forward to a defined pension plan in retirement. I’ve heard from many investors in their 20s and 30s who, like you, are contemplating an all-equity portfolio, and it’s not surprising. Stocks have a significantly higher expected return than bonds, so if you have a very long time horizon, why not strive for maximum growth?
The problem is, what makes sense on a spreadsheet doesn’t always hold up in real life. While long-term stock investing has mostly been rewarding, the short-term is often gut-wrenching. Market fluctuations will frequently trim your portfolio by 20% in a matter of a few months, and during your lifetime you should probably expect an all-stock portfolio to be cut in half at least once. Only the most disciplined investors can endure losses like that without being tempted to sell their stocks, which is a surefire way to sabotage a long-term plan.
Even more difficult than the painful but short-lived downturn is the prolonged bear market. The financial crisis of 2008–09 was devastating, but it lasted only about six months and the recovery was remarkably quick. Compare that to the aftermath of the dot-com bust at the turn of the millennium: A portfolio consisting of equal parts Canadian, U.S. and international stocks saw three consecutive calendar years of negative returns. That was a long, excruciating ride, and many investors jumped ship well before things turned around in 2003.
Jonathan, you are 30 years old and weren’t investing during the first decade of the millennium, so you won’t have any first-hand experience with losses of this magnitude. Since 2009, investors have enjoyed one of the best-ever periods for stock markets: double-digit returns and remarkably little volatility. As a result, many younger investors have overestimated their risk tolerance.
Sure, on an intellectual level, they may understand that an all-stock portfolio will likely experience multiple haircuts, but if they haven’t actually experienced it, that doesn’t mean much. In his immortal book, Where Are The Customers’ Yachts?, first published in 1940, Wall Street trader Fred Schwed put it like this: “There are certain things that cannot be adequately explained to a virgin either by words or pictures. Nor can any description that I might offer here even approximate what it feels like to lose a real chunk of money that you used to own.”
It’s also important to remember that at age 30 you can’t assume you will enjoy a comfortable defined benefit pension in retirement. A lot can happen between now and then, including multiple job changes. (The situation might be different for public servants who already have 20 or more years of service and a pension that is essentially guaranteed.)
If I still haven’t convinced you, Jonathan, the good news is that building a global stock portfolio is simpler and cheaper than it’s ever been. The Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT) allows you to achieve this with a single fund. This ETF is approximately 40% US equities, 30% Canadian equities and 30% international equities, covering both developed and emerging markets. It holds about 12,000 stocks from around the world, and it gets automatically rebalanced so it requires virtually no maintenance—all for an annual management fee of just 0.22%.
If you like the idea of a one-fund portfolio but are having second thoughts about going all-in with equities, Vanguard, iShares and BMO all offer asset allocation ETFs that include bonds as well as a global mix of stocks. These balanced ETFs are likely to be a better choice for most investors who haven’t yet been tested by a deep or prolonged bear market.
Dan Bortolotti, CFP, CIM, is a portfolio manager and financial planner with PWL Capital in Toronto.
If a link has an asterisk (*) at the end of it, that means it's an affiliate link and can sometimes result in a payment to MoneySense which helps our website stay free to our users. It's important to note that our editorial content will never be impacted by these links. We try our best to look at all available products in the market and where a product ranks in our article or whether or not it's included in the first place is never driven by compensation. For more details read our MoneySense Monetization policy.