- Comments (44)
- Text Size: Down Up
moneysense.ca, 3/05/10
Best Places to Live 2010: Methodology
This year’s Best Places to Live measures 179 cities, up from 154 last year. To come up with the ranking, we gathered information on Census Metropolitan Areas and Census Agglomeration areas that had a population of 10,000 or greater (and for which the required data was available). We then broke up the CMAs of Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Quebec City, Hamilton, Oshawa and Kitchener into their component cities of 50,000 or more in population.
We then ranked each community by the following categories. The categories were scored out of a given number of points. The higher the potential points, the more weight that category had in our final ranking.
WALK/BIKE TO WORK – 7 Points – Data taken from 2006 Statistics Canada reports.
WEATHER -18 Points (6 for each of amount of precipitation, number of wet days, days below 0). Ideal volume of precipitation was considered to by 700 ml per year – Source: Environment Canada
AIR QUALITY – 2 Points – One point for parts per million of ozone and one point for levels of suspended fine particulate matter, both of which are major components of smog. Data was from monitoring stations in or nearest to each city and reported by the National Air Pollution Surveillance Network.
POPULATION GROWTH – 10 Points – 2006 figures from Stats Canada. Results are based on the average Canadian growth from 01-06 of 5.4% plus 2% as an ideal rate. Higher created problems, lower meant less opportunities. Cities with negative growth received 0 points.
UNEMPLOYMENT – 10 Points – 2009 data from Statistics Canada when provided and 2010 estimates derived from Canadian Demographics.
HOUSING – 15 Points (7.5 for average house prices & 7.5 for time to buy a house) House average prices from reports and listings by MLS, Toronto, Fraser Valley, Vancouver and Quebec Real Estate Boards. Time to buy was derived from average price divided by average 2010 estimated household income sourced from Canadian Demographics.
HOUSEHOLD INCOME – 4 Points – 2010 estimates as per Canadian Demographics
DISCRETIONARY INCOME – 4 Points – Discretionary household income as a percentage of total household income derived from 2010 estimates as per Canadian Demographics. Taking a percentage adjusts for higher cost of living and tax factors.
NEW CARS – 4 Points – 2007-2009 model year vehicles as a percent of total vehicles as per Canadian Demographics
INCOME TAXES – 2 Points – Cities ranked according to the rate of combined federal and provincial (or territorial) income tax paid on an income of $50,000 as per Ernst & Young.
SALES TAXES – 1 Point – Cities ranked according to the rate of provincial or territorial sales tax as per www.taxtips.ca
CRIME – 5 points – Violent crime rates (2 points), total crime rates (2 points) per 100,000 people and crime severity rates (1 point) for 2008 from the Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics.
DOCTORS – 6 Points – General practice and specialist physicians per community provided by the Canadian Medical Association and converted to doctors per 1,000 people.
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS – 4 Points – Percentage of people in each city who are employed in health occupations according to the 2006 census.
TRANSIT – 5 points – Based on the percentage of the workforce utilizing public transit according the 2006 census
AMMENITIES – 3 points – One point each for a hospital, university and college. A city’s university or college had to have an enrollment of at least 1,000 students to be included. Cities in a CMA area received credit if a particular institution was located anywhere in the CMA.
CULTURE – Bonus points. A city could receive up to 5 points based on the percentage of people employed in arts, culture, recreation and sports.
moneysense.ca, 3/05/10










Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
Cool Posting…
..This posting was wickid cool…
Great Site……
[...]check this out as this contains important information about[...]…
[...] things on this survey the Mayor could not even control, unless he claims to control the weather! Seriously, 10 points of this survey were given for unemployment while 18 points were given for weath…! This is not a survey I trust to say that the Mayor has done a good job for his [...]
[...] in a category. Some categories are worth 10 points, some worth less — you can find out more on our methodology [...]
I hope no one really pays much heed to this magazine's ranking for their life decisions. These survey results are extremely questionable. The methodology, while seemingly detailed, has such a bizarre weighting system that it cannot be reflective of anyone's true preferences for a "great city to live in". Weather is more important than employment and crime combined? Why are their so many different categories for essentially the same concept? How do transit, walking, and ownership of new cars relate in terms of making a city great to live in? Is it better if there are more new cars? Hunh? Where is the common sense, let alone sense of responsibility to make this at least somewhat accurate?
I'd love to see what folks at Mercer and the Economist Intelligence Unit who have been doing similar rankings on a global scale think of these rankings and the methodology. They rate Toronto 16th in the world, and 4th in the world respectively. It's hard to see how the same city ends up 85th in Canada alone.
EIU: http://www.eiu.com/site_info.asp?info_name=The_Gl...
Mercer: http://www.mercer.com/qualityoflivingpr#City_Rank...
As a resident of Fort McMurray (Wood Buffalo) apparently ranking #1 for income matters less than biking to work? Also, a sizable number of workers here utilizes company provided bussing to and from work (better than public transit)-was that taken into account? While people are biking to work at their $26,000 a year job in nowheresville Ontario or Quebec, I am quite satisfied with an income that affords me a large house and all the toys I want and at least one international vacation a year. While people are trying to enjoy some pathetic folkfest in Edmonton, I'm affluent enough to be listening to Mozart in Vienna or Coldplay in London.
Does anyone know from where they derived their data? 1.5 million people within an hour's drive of Moncton is laughable. Wiki (admittedly not the best source, but they used the latest Census data) publishes about 192,000 people within the economic region.
Hey everyone,
I love reading what everyone has to say about their places in Canada. If I wish to check out cities or towns in the USA I can go to Sperlings Best Places or City guide to get the scoop on stats and opinions of what it is really like to live there. I wish there was a website in Canada that was like either of these so I could find out about where I want to live next in Canada. I spent many soggy years in Vancouver and now am completely priced out of the housing market. I just don't have a cool million for an average house in the city.
So if there are any websites that anyone knows about where I could find out what people really think about their cities along with vital statistics please let me know. And keep the comments on this website coming cuz I'm listening. Two of my target cities are Saskatoon and Kingston.
Good one, pat. I love central BC and live in one of the towns at the bottom of MoneySense's ridiculous list. What do you expect from a magazine that totally missed the economic meltdown until it bit them on their fat a$$ets?
Ottawa? You are joking, right? You're not? That's hilarious.
Wow! Vancouver is the number 1 city to live in the world but 29th in Canada. Housing prices generally reflect the desire of people to live there. Housing is cheap in places like Brandon because its a dump, not the 7th best city to live in. I've lived and travelled all over Canada and I choose to live in BC because there is no comparison. You may have moneysense in making this list but no commonsense.
what would make this survey truly useful is if its online version could be customized.
examples:
- maybe my weather preferences are different than the author`s – let me change the points assigned for this.
- maybe i don`t care about % of late model cars – let me assign 0 points for that.
If this could be done, the results could become meaningful for people; MoneySense will have produced something a wide number of people could actually use. As it is, it`s simply one magazine`s opinion which, while it will get people riled up & arguing & bring media attention, is only useful as bird cage liner.
I teach at a University that apparently doessn't exist! I examined one community and found numerous errrors. For instance, Kelowna has both a University (UBCO) and a college (Okanagan); the population is 106,707, not 135,010; the unemployment rate is 4.8% for the city, not 7.1%. I could go on but I think oyu get the point. I noticed that many other people have complained as weel, which leaves 2 questions: how many errors did oyu make and did oyu get any city right?
Lol love hearing all the BC people moan and complain, its ok you dont always have to be number 1, just come to ottawa, No gang violence violent crime and everyone can speak one of our "official" 2 languages
wouldnt want to live in ottawa with the horrible winters.How many times a year do you have to fill your oil tank or how much is your gas bill or your electric bill. At least here everyone speaks to everyone they do not ignore yoou if you do not speak one of the "official" languages
I agree. I used to live in Ottawa. the worst place I have ever lived bar none. cold and snowy in winter and hot and hhumid in summer. I now live in Vancouver the 4th best city in the world but the 27th best in Canada. i don't get it.
Right on Senator, and don't forget, you can either ride your bike or use the transit system to go to work, the culture and great tourism industry, I miss Ottawa. Stuck in BC and can't wait to get out…
This type of journalism is extremely harmful to the good of all. The ranking system is questionable, to whom takes credit for deciding what value set the rest of us has. Best places to live is a personal choice, what is important to some aren't important to others. Some places ranked don't have public transit, where are the points for scenery, serenity and peacefulness. Not much emphasis on air quality ?? New cars , Huh! This is obviously a capatalist article written based on the once again all mighty buck.