Best all-in-one ETFs for 2022

Presented By
Questrade
Asset-allocation ETFs have become so popular that they comprise nearly half of this year’s All-Star panel picks.
Presented By
Questrade
Asset-allocation ETFs have become so popular that they comprise nearly half of this year’s All-Star panel picks.
Asset-allocation exchange-traded funds (ETFs), also called all-in-one ETFs, have become increasingly popular among Canadian investors, so it’s no wonder that 15 of the panel’s overall “Best ETFs for Canadians” selections are in this category. All but a few of the choices received unanimous support from our panellists, and there were no new additions this year. “Asset-allocation ETFs absolutely changed the game when they came on the scene a few years ago, and now nearly every ETF provider offers a suite of these all-in-one products, which is great for investor choice,” says Robb Engen.
There was some discussion around adding two Fidelity all-in-one funds—the Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL) and the Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO)—because they’ve allocated 2% and 3% of their investments, respectively, to the Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC), which invests directly in bitcoin. While the panel agreed these were interesting options, they ultimately said no because of the funds’ exposure to crypto.
“I would exclude anything that uses cryptocurrency,” says Mark Yamada, adding that he would extend that same concern to any asset with no expected return, like more general currencies and gold.
Out of all the choices that did make the list, Dale Roberts leans more towards HGRO, Horizons’ offering, for its tax efficiency and portfolio construction. It holds six total return ETFs, including the Horizons U.S. Large Cap Index ETF, the Horizons S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF and the Horizons Emerging Markets ETF.
Yves Rebetez and Mark Seed have a bias to XGRO, which is 80% equities and 20% fixed income, as “the traditional 60/40 balanced fund will likely suffer from rising rates,” says Rebetez. “We don’t necessarily think the traditional balanced fund is dead, but some think so, which is why in your asset accumulation years it’s likely best to learn to live with stocks, including the short-term volatility, to be rewarded long-term with equities. Although now, with the severe bond correction, we may have some better risk reward to re-enter some bond exposure.”
To view all the data in this chart, use your mouse or two fingers to slide the columns right or left. To download the list to your device, tap or click your preferred format (Excel, CSV or PDF) below.
Watch: Asset-Allocation ETFs
This article was originally published in 2012 and is updated annually (most recently on May 25, 2022).
Share this article Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Share on Reddit Share on Email
Re: HGRO
You say “management fee doesn’t include underlying ETFs” but what about the MER? Does the MER include the underlying ETFs…and what about HBAL & HCON?
Also HGRO is the only fund for which you comment that it provides “global exposure.” Is that to say the other funds listed do not provide global exposure?
From panellist Mark Seed:
1. https://www.horizonsetfs.com/ETF/HGRO#
re: The management fee should be part of the MER but as you know, there might be other fees involved with any fund as well.
Based on the literature I see on the Horizons ETF site, currently HGRO MER = 0.16%.
So, the HGRO MER, should, consist of the management fee as well re: re: the cost of running the fund. I’m not sure why Horizons ETFs don’t list that?
I was only taking the literature from their site to avoid any misrepresentation.
HGRO is subject to the fees of its underlying ETFs. Horizons ETFs currently anticipates that the management expense ratio of HGRO will be approximately 0.16%, and will not exceed 0.17%, while the aggregate trading expense ratio of the portfolio of Horizons TRI ETFs held by HGRO will be approximately 0.14% and is not expected exceed 0.20%. As trading expense ratios include expenses outside of the Manager’s control, the trading expense ratio of HGRO is subject to change at any time.
2. I didn’t mean to imply other ETFs don’t have some “global exposure” rather HGRO has global exposure as part of it’s all-in-one structure by design.
In HGRO, folks get Canadian, U.S., including some NASDAQ tilt, and some international flavour via Europe, developed and international markets.
Mark,
Thanks for your prompt reply. It may just be me but I wasn’t sure what exactly your reply was trying to convey so I did the weighted average using figures from the Horizons web site and the short answer is YES, the MER listed for HGRO includes the expenses incurred by the underlying funds…and the same is true re HBAL & HCON, though Horizons’ footnotes could be clearer!
Of course you are correct that no MER includes trading expenses (typically expressed as a Trading Expense Ratio or TER) but it’s not because those expenses are out of the manager’s control. (Indeed, to the extent the TER reflects portfolio turnover, it also reflects a manager’s propensity to trade, at least in the case of an actively managed fund.) Rather, accounting principles require commissions incurred to buy a security be included in the cost of the security and commissions incurred to sell a security be subtracted from the proceeds of that sale so, to include them in management expenses would be to count them twice. By the way, the HGRO TER for 2020 was 0.18%.
The advantage with Horizon’s TRI all in one offerings is that they don’t distribute dividends, but rather they accrue to the NAV, or net asset value. While Canadian dividends are tax advantaged, US dividend’s aren’t. In a tax-free account it doesn’t matter, but in a margin or corporate account, having the earnings treated as capital gains (upon sale only) is worth something as well IMO.
Reading a lot about retirement portfolios without bonds. 90% equities and 10% cash. With the notion that bonds in a post pandenic world will remain low performers. Hold cash that you’ll need to draw on for two years. Most downturn in the markets have historically been returning to rise within two years. Please provide some yoour insight from your staff on this portfolio approach.
Hi there! First off, I am so appreciative of Moneysense!
I need to clarify, are any of these ETFs specifically Index ETFs? I invest in Vangaurd Growth, but for my book suggests iShares Growth. Are they a similar product or is IShares index or Vanguard not?
Thanks!