The downside of naming children as RRIF beneficiaries - MoneySense

The downside of naming children as RRIF beneficiaries

Kerry is doing some estate planning with his RRIF and wants to make sure it goes to his wife and kids in the best possible manner.

by

Q: Should your spouse be listed as a beneficiary or a successor holder on a RRIF in Ontario and why? If both I and my spouse died together, can I name our three children as secondary beneficiary? If yes does this avoid what was called probate in Ontario? My wife is younger, and we will use her age to calculate my withdrawals, but can she list the children as secondary beneficiaries on her RRSP and does this pass to the children (if I am gone) without going to the estate?

— Kerry

A: I wrote recently about the difference between beneficiaries and successor annuitants for Registered Retirement Income Funds (RRIFs), Kerry. Check out that column here.

The short story is:

1) Only a spouse can be named as a successor annuitant;

2) Naming a spouse as successor annuitant when they are older than you can be beneficial, as your RRIF can live on after you, and smaller required minimum withdrawals may continue based on your younger age.

Ask a Planner: Leave your question for Jason Heath »

Since your wife is younger, there may not be the same advantage to naming her as successor annuitant for your RRIF instead of beneficiary. You’re older, and if you elected when you started your RRIF to base the withdrawals on your own age, she may not want to be forced to take larger minimum withdrawals than she would otherwise have to take from her own RRIF if you died and she was just the beneficiary.

You mentioned she has a Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP). She might consider naming you as successor annuitant when she converts to a RRIF, given you are older and if she died first, you could base your subsequent minimum withdrawals on her younger age.

Naming your children as the secondary beneficiaries or contingent beneficiaries for your RRIF account may be an option. I say “may” for a couple reasons. You need to first ensure your financial institution allows you to name a contingent beneficiary. But beyond that, it may not be a good idea, even if you want your RRIF to go your kids if your wife dies before you or at the same time as you. Here’s why.

Say you name your wife as your primary beneficiary and your three kids as contingent beneficiaries. What happens if your wife dies first, you develop a cognitive impairment that lasts several years prior to your death, and one of your children dies before you? If your RRIF states that your three children are the contingent beneficiaries, and one of them has died, the RRIF will be divided between your two surviving children. In other words, the estate of a contingent beneficiary who has died may not be entitled to receive an inheritance from a RRIF.

A will would often be written to ensure that if one of your children were a beneficiary of your estate, and they died before you, their share would go to their children – your grandchildren – assuming that was your wish.

READ: Should I make both my kids executors to my will?

The point is, a will is more flexible than a beneficiary designation on an RRSP or RRIF, and may account for more situations, however unlikely they may seem today.

Even if you figure you would change your beneficiaries if something happened to one of your children, as I suggested in my example, what if you were cognitively impaired and unable to do so? A power of attorney who manages your financial affairs if you are unable to do so is specifically restricted from making changes to beneficiary designations, so that won’t work either.

Some people are reluctant to have assets pass through their estates because they want to avoid probate at all costs. In certain provinces, probate can be substantial in dollar terms for large estates, and I would attempt to avoid probate when prudent to do so. But on a percentage basis, Ontario’s 1.5% probate fee, for example, is still relatively small. I caution people against risking their estate not being distributed the way they want it to be simply to avoid probate. The risk of paying probate fees needs to be weighed against the risk of your estate wishes not being carried out.

The same logic would apply to your question about naming your children as the secondary beneficiaries or contingent beneficiaries of your wife’s RRSP, Kerry. You must weigh the risk of her estate not being distributed the way you want if something happens to one of your children, and whether naming her estate as the contingent beneficiary is preferable.

When it comes to estate planning, there is not just one right way to do things. You should walk through the ‘what if’ scenarios based on your beneficiary designations. And if assets are held jointly, or have beneficiaries, remember that they won’t pass through your will. It’s also important to consider how much tax will be payable on certain assets and where the funds will come from to pay these taxes.

In this way, you can assess what would happen, who would get what, and how to maximize your estate, when, not if, you die.

We’ll all die someday. Worrying about dying is a pointless endeavor that just gets in the way of living. But worrying about what happens to your money when you die is prudent and an important consideration in your holistic financial planning.

Ask a Planner: Leave your question for Jason Heath »

Jason Heath is a fee-only, advice-only Certified Financial Planner (CFP) at Objective Financial Partners Inc. in Toronto, Ontario. He does not sell any financial products whatsoever.