Ask MoneySense: Portfolio rebalancing

Couch Potato investors typically have a target asset mix that needs rebalancing at least once a year.



From the June 2012 issue of the magazine.


I have had Couch Potato accounts set up for about six years. Whenever I add new money, I’ve been buying more of the ETFs that have done poorly, leaving the best performers alone. Does this strategy make sense?

Brad Riddell, Straffordville, Ont.

“You’re doing the right thing, even if it doesn’t feel like it,” says Dan Bortolotti, author of the MoneySense Guide to the Perfect Portfolio. Couch Potato investors typically have a target asset mix: for example, they may plan to keep equal amounts in stocks and bonds. By adding new money to the worst performers each year, you’re not only keeping your risk level consistent, you’re also “buying low.”

The only problem is this technique stops working when your portfolio becomes large relative to the size of your contributions. For example, say your portfolio is $200,000 with a target of half stocks, half bonds. After a good year for the markets, the portfolio might end up with 55% stocks ($110,000) and 45% bonds ($90,000). Now you would have to add $20,000 in new money to the bond side to get back to even, and many people won’t have that much cash available. In that case, you should sell $10,000 worth of stocks and put the proceeds into bonds to get back to your target allocation.

2 comments on “Ask MoneySense: Portfolio rebalancing

  1. Thanks! I had wondered that too.


  2. Brad Have you done any research on the types of bonds that should be used? My guess is goverment bonds. Reason being when confidence switches to private sector the masses buy stocks & sell thier goverment bonds. When confidence switches to the goverment the masses buy goverment bonds & sell stocks. When the masses fear the private sector & goverment @ the same time then they sell stock & bonds & if goverment defaults as history shows its just a matter of time all money will be lost if you keep putting money into something that goes to zero. The asset allocation might work for a hundred years or more but @ some point will fail. I cant find an investment that I have a 100% confidence in & asset allocation is far from the worst I can think of & the best investment Iam not smart enough to know.


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *