Why am I paying a commission when I invest in GICs? - MoneySense

GICs have a hidden commission

How your advisor may be being paid twice



Q. After buying two GICs, I received a statement showing $575 in commissions paid to my broker by a third party. I thought GICs were free of commissions. Any light you could shed on these fees would be greatly appreciated.


A. There are few universal truths in investing, Tom, but one is that nothing is free. Fees on financial products can be transparent or hidden, but they are always in there somewhere. In the case of GICs*, the commissions are so well hidden that very few investors even know they exist.

If you buy a GIC through an agent—whether an online brokerage, a GIC broker, or a financial advisor—the issuer of the GIC pays a commission to that agent. The amount is typically 0.25% of the face value of the GIC multiplied by the number of years to maturity.

Related: Is it safe to have $600,000 invested in GICs?

Here’s an example. Let’s say you work with a financial advisor and she decides to purchase a five-year GIC in your account for $25,000. The advisor has a list of banks, credit unions and trust companies offering GICs, and she learns that XYZ Bank currently offers the best interest rates. After the advisor places the order, XYZ Bank will pay her a commission of $312.50, which is $25,000 x 0.25% x 5.

It’s important to understand that the commission is not subtracted from the advertised rate of the GIC: the 0.25% is an additional amount paid directly by the XYZ Bank to the agent. This is why many people are unaware that GICs pay commissions—although as you’ve noticed, Tom, these third-party payments are listed in your annual report of compensation paid to your advisor.

Just because a commission is baked into the price of a financial product, that doesn’t mean it’s free. If you’ve ever wondered why you get better rates when you buy GICs directly from the issuer, rather than through an advisor or brokerage, that’s because direct-sold GICs* don’t include that commission to the middleman.

Advisors will argue, reasonably enough, that they need to be paid for their services. And since GICs (unlike mutual funds) do not pay ongoing “trailing commissions,” an upfront commission is the only way some advisors are compensated for buying GICs for their clients.

Related: 7 ways to start investing smarter now

However, if you work with an advisor who charges an annual fee based on the value of your portfolio, then collecting GIC* commissions might be considered double-dipping. To return to our example, if an advisor charges a 1% annual fee then she would collect $250 per year in fees for holding that $25,000 GIC in addition to the $312.50 commission she received when it was purchased.

That’s why fee-based advisors who hold themselves to a fiduciary standard do not accept commissions on products they purchase in a client’s account. At our firm, for example, we rebate commissions paid to us by GIC issuers, so the client gets that extra 0.25%. Advisors deserve to be paid, but you shouldn’t have to pay them twice.

Compare The Best GIC Rates in Canada »