Why a reverse mortgage should be a last resort for most Canadian retirees
Reverse mortgages do the job of freeing up income for house-rich, cash-poor Canadian seniors. But their terms are often less favourable than the alternatives.
Advertisement
Reverse mortgages do the job of freeing up income for house-rich, cash-poor Canadian seniors. But their terms are often less favourable than the alternatives.
While I, myself, have never been tempted to consider taking out a reverse mortgage, it is a concept that may have appeal for some. It’s not for nothing that you see all those TV advertisements on Canadian and American channels.
Despite the high profile, there’s not a huge number of reverse mortgage products available in Canada. The two main ones of which I’m aware are Equitable Bank and HomeEquity Bank (a.k.a. CHIP Reverse Mortgage). According to Canada.ca, reverse mortgages typically cost more than conventional mortgages and home equity lines of credit (HELOCs). This is because the borrower is not required to make payments, so the lender must wait years to get its money back—seven to 12 years, on average.
My personal take is that reverse mortgages should be considered only as a last resort for homeowners who really need a bit of tax-advantaged monthly income, who don’t have heirs to whom they can bequeath their estate, and who want to stay in their home as long as possible.
Advice-only financial planner Jason Heath, of Objective Financial Partners Inc., agrees. “I think retirees should generally look to their investments or a home equity line of credit before a reverse mortgage. And then consider downsizing or selling and renting as options as well.”
The problem with a HELOC or a traditional mortgage is a borrower is subject to the same income criteria as any other homeowner. And retirees typically won’t qualify for much.
A reverse mortgage enables a home owner to borrow up to 55% of the appraised value of their primary residence, paid either as a lump sum or in multiple payments over time. The borrower must be age 55 or older and have paid off any existing mortgage, home equity line of credit (HELOC) or other debt secured by the same property. They can use the proceeds of the reverse mortgage to pay off this debt.
Read the full definition in the MoneySense Glossary: What is a reverse mortgage?
If you do decide to take out a reverse mortgage, ideally, there are no heirs, or they are so well-heeled they won’t mind if they inherit a bit less: like annuities, reverse mortgages reduce the capital available for your estate. I do have an acquaintance who has no heirs, who bought a Toronto home decades ago and is sitting on a fair bit of home equity. I couldn’t think of a reason to talk him out of it, and he seems to be quite happy in retirement, still in his home and generating enough cash for a modest retired lifestyle.
Author P.J. Wade is well known for her 1999 book, Have Your Home and Money Too (Horizon Pubs & Distributors, April 1993), which neatly sums up the appeal of reverse mortgages. The quote that sticks out in my mind when I once interviewed her was that reverse mortgages can be “your best friend or your worst enemy… your choice.”
Matthew Ardrey, senior wealth advisor at Toronto-based TriDelta Financial says “a reverse mortgage simply is leveraging your home after age 55. There are several institutions that will create a loan structure secured against the value of your home, which you can then draw upon periodically or in a lump sum. The maximum limit they will lend is 55% [of the home’s value], though it may be less than that. One of the benefits they state is your income is tax-free! How nice of them to give you income from a tax-free asset on a tax-free basis.”
You may infer from his tone that, like myself, Ardrey is not a huge proponent of these structures. He uses an example that is provided on one of the reverse-mortgage provider websites to illustrate possible problems with reverse mortgages. It involves a house worth $600,000 and the home owner draws $150,000 in year one with an interest rate of 6.34%. After only five years the accumulated interest will be $54,939.
“This leaves a total outstanding now of $204,939, with the interest owing being 25% of the balance owing after only five years,” says Ardrey. “As time goes on, this can overtake the entire value of the home. Thankfully, they do note that there is no negative equity, but there is not much left at the end of the day for the home owner or their heirs.”
Heath points to the fact that reverse mortgage rates tend to be much higher than traditional sources. “A borrower can expect to pay at least a couple percentage points more than mortgages and lines of credit. But if you read the fine print in your home equity line of credit agreement, the lender typically reserves the right to decrease your limit or even call the outstanding balance.”
So, homeowners should not count on their HELOC being available when they need it.
Right now, reverse mortgage variable rates are in the 9.5% range, while 5-year variable mortgage rates are about 6%. And the reverse mortgage 5-year fixed rates are about 7%, and 5-year fixed mortgage rates are about 5%. HELOC rates are generally 1% above prime, so they’re currently around 7.95%. “There is definitely a premium paid to take advantage of reverse mortgages,” says Heath.
Ardrey raises another concern: how retirement living care can be paid for. “Often a home can be sold when a senior moves into retirement living, allowing them to pay for this care. In this example, the ability to use the home for this purpose would be significantly impaired.”
He suggests that instead of using a reverse mortgage that could cripple the financial future, retirees need to look honestly at their situation and the lifestyle they can afford. “Though it may not be preferable to sell their home and live somewhere else, it may also be their financial reality. This speaks to the value of planning ahead to avoid being house-rich and cash-poor.”
Search our directory of credentialled advisors providing financial and investing services across Canada.
Allan Small, senior investment advisor with IA Private Wealth Inc., says reverse mortgages “have not played a part in any of the retirement plans and retirement planning that I have done so far in my career. I think the reverse mortgage idea or concept, for whatever reason, has not caught on.” Also, “those individual investors I see usually have money to invest, or they have already invested. Most downsize their residence and take the equity out that way versus pulling money out of the property while still living in it.”
Finance professor and author Moshe Milevsky told me in an email, that when it comes to reverse mortgages—or any other financial strategy or product in the realm of decumulation—“I always ask this question before giving an opinion: Compared to what?” He worries about the associated interest-rate risk, which is “difficult to control, manage or even comprehend at advanced ages with cognitive decline.”
What are the alternatives to a reverse mortgage? Is it selling the house and moving to downsize? Or, as Milevsky asks, “Is the alternative reducing your standard of living? Is the alternative taking a loan from a local bookie? It’s the alternative that determines whether the reverse mortgage is a good idea or not,” he says. “Generally, I will not rule them out and I think they will continue to grow in popularity among retiring boomers, but I wouldn’t place them at the very top of the to-do list when you get to your golden years.”
Share this article Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Share on Reddit Share on Email
In a study released Sept 2023 The Canadian Federation for Financial Planning asked Financial Planners the following. “3. Generally, using a reverse mortgage early in retirement to support a retirement plan is better than as a last resort towards the end of retirement. True or False. Only 19% of Financial Planners answered correctly while 55% answered incorrectly.
Sacks and Sacks (2012) used Monte Carlo simulations to quantify how retirement spending strategies experience higher probabilities of success when using a reverse mortgage early in retirement as opposed to a last resort. They show that coordinating a reverse mortgage with investment portfolio withdrawals help improve the success rate of the portfolio and improve the possibility for leaving a legacy. Salter et al. (2012) find that there are significant benefits in coordinating a reverse mortgage line of credit with a systematic portfolio withdrawal strategy to generate retirement income. Pfau (2015) finds that there is great value for clients to open a reverse mortgage line of credit at the earliest possible age.
This is a good explanation.
Reverse mortgages are very expensive when you look at fees and appraisal costs, plus the high interest rate which COMPOUNDS annually and eats up your home equity.
I was looking at a CHIP mortgage 6 years ago. The appraisal fee was $600 and there was another fee I can’t recall right now. The difference in the mortgage rate at that time was 4% compared to variable rate mortgages at RBC.
I had a small mortgage and I looked at a Home Equity Line of Credit at RBC. They would cover the appraisal fee and provide a WestJet gift card for $700. The mortgage rate was 3.5% lower on a 5 year term than the CHIP plan and it didn’t compound. But you have to make payments – and on a line of credit at least the interest cost monthly. I figured I could make the payments via the line of credit and I would save on CHIP compound interest at a higher rate. I used a chunk of the line of credit to invest with RBC Direct Investing in closed end Mutual Funds. The income far exceeded the monthly mortgage and LC interest cost AND I was able to write off the LC interest cost to my income tax as a carrying charge.
This has been a win for us. Yes, I had to make mortgage payments but the rate is lower and the balance is reducing instead of climbing as it does with a reverse mortgage. I was also able to claim my LC interest costs. If you didn’t have an existing mortgage before the Home Plan, you can also deduct the mortgage interest cost because you are using the funds for investment. I used the excess income from my investments to pay down my mortgage because RBC allows an annual 10% payment of the original mortgage amount. So, in 5 years I have paid off the $100,000 mortgage and am now paying down the LC balances. We have a very comfortable investment income on top of pension funds.