Debunking Dividend Myths: Part 1

This post is the first in a series exploring common myths and misunderstandings about dividend investing. The goal of the series is to argue that many investors following a dividend-focused strategy may be better off with broad-based index funds. Dividend Myth #1: Companies that pay dividends are inherently better investments than those that don’t. Many [...]

60

by

Online only.

60



This post is the first in a series exploring common myths and misunderstandings about dividend investing. The goal of the series is to argue that many investors following a dividend-focused strategy may be better off with broad-based index funds.

Dividend Myth #1: Companies that pay dividends are inherently better investments than those that don’t.

Many investors take it for granted that dividend-paying companies are superior to those that do not pay a yield. But this idea has been the subject of debate for decades, and many academics believe that it is irrational.

Let’s start with something everyone can agree on. Equity returns have two components: capital gains (price increases) and dividends. Add them together and you have the total return for a stock. Ignoring taxes and transactions costs, a stock that pays no dividend but increases in price by 6% provides precisely the same return as one whose share price rises 4% and pays a 2% dividend.

Dividends lead to a drop in share price

What many investors don’t grasp is the direct relationship between share prices and cash dividends. If a company’s stock is trading at $20 and it pays a $1 dividend, its share price will fall to $19 on the ex-dividend date. This price drop may not be penny for penny, because it will be combined with normal fluctuations in the daily markets. But there is always a trade-off. The failure to understand this point is the reason that so many investors think of dividends as “free money.”

In 1961, Merton Miller and Frank Modigliani published a landmark paper that became the basis for what is now known as the dividend irrelevance theory. They argued that whether or not a company pays dividends should not matter to shareholders, because it does not affect their overall returns. Dividend policy simply determines whether investors end up with a share valued at $20, or a share worth $19 plus $1 in cash.

Not everyone accepts the Miller-Modigliani model. Two other economists, Myron Gordon and John Lintner published a counter argument that has come to be called the bird-in-the-hand theory. Their idea was that shareholders cannot be sure that a company will spend its capital wisely, so a dollar paid in dividends is preferable to one kept as retained earnings. This may be true, but investors who advocate DRIP programs cannot logically subscribe to this theory: if they truly believed it, they would not reinvest their cash dividends in new shares.

The illusion of income v. capital

Why do shareholders believe so strongly that a $1 dividend is preferable to a $1 capital gain? Meir Statman looked at this question in a 1984 article called “Explaining Investor Preference for Cash Dividends,” coauthored by Hersh Sheffrin. He also reviews the idea in his new book, What Investors Really Want, pointing out that receiving $1,000 in dividends is no different from selling $1,000 worth of stock to create a “homemade dividend.”

Even when this idea is explained to people, most refuse to accept it. Statman suggests that it comes down to a cognitive bias called mental accounting. Investors categorize $1,000 in dividends as income that they will happily spend, but the idea of selling $1,000 worth of stock is “dipping into capital,” which causes them great anxiety. This idea is deeply ingrained in many investors, but it is an illusion, because a company that pays a dividend to shareholders is depleting its own capital.

Other sources of shareholder return

There are other compelling arguments against the inherent superiority of dividend-paying stocks:

  • Many companies that pay no dividends use their free cash to repurchase stock. These buybacks increase the value of the remaining shares, which benefits all shareholders. There is no logical reason to prefer dividends over stock repurchases when the net benefit to investors is the same. (Indeed, share repurchases have no tax consequences, while dividend payouts do.)
  • Profitable companies that have not reached maturity can often earn much higher return on equity by reinvesting their earnings in growing businesses. Many highly profitable companies (especially in technology and mining) do not pay dividends because they can put that cash to much more productive use. These companies will typically begin paying dividends later in their life cycle, when those growth opportunities disappear.
  • It has long been known that the over the long term, small-cap stocks have dramatically outperformed large-caps (with correspondingly more risk). The small-cap premium was more than 3% during the past 80 years. Most small companies do not pay any yield, so investors who select only dividend-paying stocks are ignoring the segment of the equity market that has enjoyed the highest long-term returns.

Investors who use broad-based index funds accept that equity returns come from profitable businesses, some of which pay cash dividends, and some of which put their earnings to work in other equally rewarding ways. In the end, as Meir Statman writes, “a dollar labeled dividends is as green as a dollar labeled capital, so rational investors are indifferent between the two.”

Other posts in this series:

Dividend Myth #2: Dividend investors are successful because they select excellent companies and buy them when they are attractively priced.

Dividend Myth #3: Dividend-paying stocks are a substitute for bonds in an income-oriented portfolio.

Dividend Myth #4: You can beat the market with common sense: just focus on blue-chip companies with a competitive advantage and a history of paying dividends.

Dividend Myth #5: It’s easy to build a well diversified portfolio of Canadian dividend stocks.

60 comments on “Debunking Dividend Myths: Part 1

  1. Excellent post. Many commentators in the media (including a certain billionaire tv host on CBC) give the false impression that if corporations don't distribute earnings back to their shareholders through dividends or buy-backs, then they are weaker or inherently less attractive. The fact is that capital should be deployed to where the risk-adjusted return is the greatest. Mature companies with limited growth prospects (some telecom utilities or consumer staples) pay out dividends since shareholders can likely reinvest dividends at higher rates of return with other companies. Companies with high levels of growth are right to reinvest all earnings in the business — the shareholder is not likely to get a higher rate of return by taking the investment returns somewhere else.

    Lastly, capital gains are more tax-efficient than dividends since, unlike dividends which are taxed at 27% net of tax credits, capital gains compound tax-free until you sell the asset, resulting in a very low effective tax rate for long-term holding periods.

    Reply

  2. "The goal of the series is to argue that investors aiming for long-term growth are usually better off with broad-based index funds." This is possibly true BUT if the investor is aiming for long term INCOME, then dividend investing is the way to go, especially if you calculate the after-tax advantages.
    rr

    Reply

  3. Substituting capital growth or share repurchases in lieu of dividends may not yield equal outcomes. For those whose investment capital is not merely an inert pot that should grow and not be touched, the cash flow from the dividend stream may actually be a source of consumable income. A quarterly dividend of $500 on 1,000 RY shares is not practically replaced by the act of selling 10 shares a quarter, due to transaction costs and share price fluctuations.

    Furthermore, in some jurisdictions such as Alberta, the tax on Cdn dividends is less than the tax on capital gains, across all tax brackets. Finally, in all Canadian jurisdictions, the tax on Cdn dividends is less than the tax on capital gains, in the bottom tax bracket (taxable income < $42K).

    Reply

  4. Thomas said it all. The costs of selling versus the regular income can make a big difference to small investors.

    Reply

  5. I’ve observed in the world these days, video games are the latest phenomenon with kids of all ages. Periodically it may be unattainable to drag your children away from the video games. If you want the very best of both worlds, there are plenty of educational video games for kids. Thanks for your post.

    Reply

  6. Many all on site optimization techniques and may stop avoided. Generally these important tags are totally ignored.

    Reply

  7. Great post about how precisely raise online followers. But I sometimes follow people and also don’t follow me back. I experience plenty following and incredibly little follower.

    Reply

  8. It depends on how much the person is paying for the ad that is clicked.? You earn a different amount depending on the ad price and google doesn’t disclose how much is shared with you. If you want more money, work on building more traffic. This is purely a numbers game.

    Reply

  9. Well this could likely be considered a very good article, instead beneficial an I be conscious that it is in real truth instead crucial particularly for people teenagers who’ve dermis problems.

    Reply

  10. Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thanks Nonetheless I’m experiencing difficulty with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone getting similar rss problem? Anybody who is aware of kindly respond. Thnkx

    Reply

  11. Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn anything like this before. So good to find any person with some original ideas on this subject. realy thanks for beginning this up. this website is something that’s wanted on the net, somebody with a bit of originality. useful job for bringing one thing new to the web!

    Reply

  12. Well this could likely be considered a very good article, instead beneficial an I be conscious that it is in real truth instead crucial particularly for people teenagers who’ve dermis problems.

    Reply

  13. Thanks , I have just been looking for information about this topic for ages and yours is the best I’ve discovered so far. But, what about the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?

    Reply

  14. I simply want to tell you that I am all new to blogging and site-building and definitely savored you’re blog. Very likely I’m going to bookmark your website . You surely come with outstanding articles. With thanks for sharing with us your website page.

    Reply

  15. Errrr Many thanks for your post, I don’t quite agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I wholeheartedly applaud your effort in putting it so clearly.

    Reply

  16. I just want to mention I am just all new to blogs and certainly enjoyed your page. Likely I’m want to bookmark your blog post . You amazingly come with perfect articles and reviews. Thanks a lot for revealing your website.

    Reply

  17. Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I’ve really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. In any case I will be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again very soon!

    Reply

  18. Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an very long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t appear. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyway, just wanted to say great blog!

    Reply

  19. Thank you for taking this possibility to mention this, Personally i think strongly about this and I make use of studying this subject. If at all possible, because you gain data, please update this blog with new information. I’ve discovered it extremely useful.

    Reply

  20. You’re exactly right it’s everywhere, it’s loud plus it is awful. The worst thing reality that it is instruction young people to think this silence is really a completely no no.

    Reply

  21. I am new to the drug and alcohol rehab environment. I’m a binge drinker type alcoholic. I am trying to get as much information as possible. It’s a survival tactic I am trying. I am nervous around people I don’t know and I am nervous about not knowing what is going on. Thank you for your post. It helps make things less uncertain.

    Reply

  22. What I find difficult is finding a blog that can capture me for a minute but your posts are not alike. Great work!

    Reply

  23. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something that I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

    Reply

  24. Together with everything that appears to be developing within this particular subject matter, all your opinions are actually quite stimulating. However, I am sorry, but I can not subscribe to your whole plan, all be it stimulating none the less. It looks to me that your remarks are generally not completely justified and in simple fact you are yourself not completely confident of your point. In any event I did appreciate examining it.

    Reply

  25. great points altogether, you simply received a logo reader. What might you suggest in regards to your put up that you simply made a few days in the past? Any positive? Koha Ditore

    Reply

  26. Nearly all of whatever you articulate is astonishingly accurate and it makes me wonder why I hadn’t looked at this in this light before. This particular article truly did switch the light on for me as far as this subject goes. But at this time there is actually one position I am not too comfy with and while I attempt to reconcile that with the actual central theme of the point, let me see just what all the rest of the visitors have to point out.Well done.

    Reply

  27. Along with everything that seems to be developing throughout this specific area, many of your opinions are somewhat refreshing. Nevertheless, I am sorry, but I do not subscribe to your whole suggestion, all be it radical none the less. It seems to me that your opinions are actually not completely validated and in actuality you are yourself not totally certain of your assertion. In any case I did take pleasure in looking at it.

    Reply

  28. The core of your writing whilst appearing reasonable in the beginning, did not sit very well with me personally after some time. Someplace throughout the paragraphs you actually managed to make me a believer but just for a short while. I still have got a problem with your jumps in assumptions and one would do nicely to help fill in all those breaks. In the event that you can accomplish that, I could undoubtedly be amazed.

    Reply

  29. Throughout the awesome design of things you get a B- just for effort. Exactly where you confused me ended up being on all the details. As people say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more correct here. Having said that, permit me tell you exactly what did give good results. Your text is definitely very engaging and this is possibly why I am taking the effort in order to comment. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Next, whilst I can certainly see a jumps in reasoning you make, I am not confident of just how you appear to connect your ideas which in turn produce the final result. For the moment I will subscribe to your point however trust in the future you connect the facts better.

    Reply

  30. Just about all of the things you mention happens to be astonishingly precise and it makes me ponder the reason why I had not looked at this in this light before. This particular article really did turn the light on for me as far as this subject goes. Nonetheless there is one particular point I am not really too comfortable with and while I attempt to reconcile that with the actual core theme of your position, let me observe exactly what the rest of your subscribers have to point out.Nicely done.

    Reply

  31. The root of your writing whilst sounding agreeable at first, did not work very well with me personally after some time. Somewhere throughout the paragraphs you actually were able to make me a believer but only for a very short while. I still have a problem with your jumps in assumptions and you might do well to fill in all those gaps. When you actually can accomplish that, I could certainly end up being amazed.

    Reply

  32. There are actually loads of particulars like that to take into consideration. That may be a nice point to convey up. I offer the thoughts above as common inspiration but clearly there are questions just like the one you carry up where an important thing might be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if greatest practices have emerged round things like that, however I am positive that your job is clearly identified as a good game. Each boys and girls really feel the affect of only a second’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.

    Reply

  33. You should participate in a contest for among the finest blogs on the web. I’ll recommend this site!

    Reply

  34. I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my difficulty. You’re amazing! Thanks!

    Reply

  35. Throughout this awesome pattern of things you get an A just for effort. Exactly where you actually misplaced me personally ended up being in the details. As it is said, the devil is in the details… And that couldn’t be more true at this point. Having said that, let me inform you what did give good results. Your authoring is actually quite engaging which is most likely the reason why I am making an effort to comment. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Next, whilst I can certainly see the jumps in reason you make, I am not really convinced of exactly how you appear to connect the details which make the actual final result. For now I shall subscribe to your position but hope in the near future you connect the dots better.

    Reply

  36. Along with every little thing that appears to be building throughout this particular subject matter, many of your perspectives tend to be very stimulating. On the other hand, I appologize, but I do not give credence to your whole suggestion, all be it exhilarating none the less. It looks to us that your remarks are not entirely rationalized and in simple fact you are generally your self not really totally convinced of the point. In any event I did appreciate reading through it.

    Reply

  37. hello there and thank you for your information – I’ve definitely picked up something new from right here. I did however expertise some technical issues using this site, as I experienced to reload the web site lots of times previous to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your web host is OK? Not that I am complaining, but slow loading instances times will sometimes affect your placement in google and can damage your high-quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords. Well I am adding this RSS to my e-mail and can look out for much more of your respective fascinating content. Ensure that you update this again soon..

    Reply

  38. Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say that I’ve truly enjoyed browsing your blog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!

    Reply

  39. Employed distinctly encouraged to encounter our website. Need be by way of thanking you and your family to obtain this exceptional by means of. My decidedly savored individual section of your idea i perhaps you have book-marked to think about great new belongings you publish.

    Reply

  40. Significant ad! We?d only starting throughout town management/marketing your media and trying to grasp ideal complete the work well means of this nature file can be really significant. As the our company situated in america, the item?utes most some time fresh to with us. Typically the as an example higher as an activity that like as well, techniques to demonstration your own personal trustworthy fire and as well , commodity even though your merchandise is useful then

    Reply

  41. Hey I absolutely dig this editorial and it is too educative hence I am going to tweet it. One thing to say the Indepth research you have done is definetly exceptional . No one goes that extra mile these days? Well Done . Also one more suggestion you shouldinstitute a Translator for your Worldwide Users ..

    Reply

  42. Hi I love your comment and it was so informational and I am definetly going to save it. One thing to say the Superb analysis you have done is greatly remarkable.No one goes that extra mile these days? Bravo!! Just one more tip you shouldinstall a Translator for your Global Audience :)

    Reply

  43. “Hello. My name is Jenn Livings, delighted to make your acquaintance.

    Reply

  44. I cling on to listening in the direction of rumor speak about obtaining boundless internet dependent grant programs so i’ve been looking for near to for the best internet site to obtain one. Could you reveal to me please, especially where could i arrive around some?

    Reply

  45. I wanted to many thanks for this interesting website. I for sure loved every small bit of it. I maybe you have bookmarked your web site to see at the latest stuff you write.

    Reply

  46. Hey there, You’ve done a fantastic job. I’ll certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I’m confident they’ll be benefited from this website.

    Reply

  47. Hey, you got a great site man. Nice job. Are you interested in Corporate promotional items and custom discount trophies and awards?

    Reply

  48. Hello, you have a great blog. Relax with variety of original day spa treatments like our Signature Facials and Therepeutic Massages or treat yourself with one of our many cosmetic improvements like eyelash extensions, brow tinting, bodywraps, and hair removal; all performed by our certified estheticians and massage therapists.

    Reply

  49. I was more than happy to find this web-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this wonderful learn!! I undoubtedly having fun with each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to take a look at new stuff you blog post.

    Reply

  50. ethical self am positive fixated up to construe clear-headed the ideas abridge viewpoints. We are following open blood relative pending these affairs. People honour has till accord fixing bath gem. :)

    Reply

  51. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great. I do not know who you are but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already ;) Cheers!

    Reply

  52. I would like to share with you about some books related to investment.
    Lowell Miller’s “The Single Best Investment”, and Stephen Jarislowsky’s “The Investment Zoo”. Both of these books highlight dividend growth stocks is a great way to build investment portfolio and give information that how you can increase dividend income after retirement.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *